Jamais Vu: Quick Thoughts on the Inherent Vice trailer

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Disney's Star Wars

Posted on 3:52 PM by Gawar

The news just broke that Disney has paid $4 billion for Lucasfilm, the production company that is responsible for the Indiana Jones franchise and, of course, Red Tails. Buried somewhere in there is news that an obscure relic of the New Hollywood, something called Star Wars (1977), was also thrown in to sweeten the deal.

Kidding aside, I'm pretty stunned--primarily that Lucas would sell something he's spent his whole life working to have such tight control over. And, as a Disney scholar, I'm increasingly intrigued by Bob Iger's aggressive moves lately to buy out at any cost potentially competing (masculine) entertainment brand names (Pixar and Marvel, for example). From a studio standpoint, this is shaping up to be the most interesting period in the history of the company since Katzenberg bolted in the mid-1990s.

This also strikes me as a continuation of Disney's attempt to commodify `80s nostalgia in the age of transmedia storytelling--the heart of modern fandom. This is the same impulse which led to the otherwise inexplicable TRON: Legacy a couple of years ago. I haven't quite put my finger on it just yet (though this is partially what I'm trying to do with my current project, Haunted Nerves), but Disney's obsession with owning Star Wars seems to be more about the past--or repackaging the past--as it does about the future of either brand name.

Ironically, I spent much of today prepping tomorrow's lecture on Disney's convoluted relationship to the science-fiction genre in Star Wars' wake--namely, The Black Hole (1979), and TRON (1982). Its a little known fact that Disney passed on Star Wars in the early 1970s when Lucas first approached them with the idea. A proud, card-carrying member of the Baby Boomer/Davy Crockett generation, Lucas understood the value of Disney's ability to both promote a brand name and to exploit ancillary merchandising markets to maximum effect. So, they made sense for Star Wars.

But, precisely because Disney understood the value of those revenue streams (i.e., toys), and the value of absolute control over their intellectual property, they weren't willing to do a "partnership" with some upstart filmmaker. So, by the end of the 1970s, Disney found itself playing catch-up just like everyone else in the industry. In a sense the news today is the culmination of Disney's many attempts to atone for that mistake over the last four decades.

Somewhere, 20th Century Fox has got to be pissed.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • "you were right about Vesper"
    I have received over fifty hits this weekend from these search words--"You were right about Vesper," Bond tells M in the final mom...
  • Blossoms & Blood Reviews
    Two more strong reviews for Blossoms & Blood . . . First off, Cineaste had in part this to say in the latest issue: "'Blossoms...
  • Summer Notes
    Haven't blogged much any more, but the good news is that overall my writing has picked up again. So, this will just be a quick note to m...
  • Self-Theorizing Nostalgia
    With grading and syllabi (for the moment) mostly behind me, I'm spending the next three weeks finishing revisions on Flickers of Film . ...
  • Quick Thoughts on the Inherent Vice trailer
    Prepping for Punch Drunk Love in my intro class. Interesting timing that the trailer for Inherent Vice (2014) came out while I was rethinki...
  • Notes on Daws, Shoal of Time: A History of the Hawaiian Islands
    I did some research last week at the UW-Madison archives on Walter Mirisch’s papers concerning the movie, Hawaii (1966), which didn’t initi...
  • Thoughts on Inherent Vice
    I posted my thoughts on the film, which I caught last week in Evanston, over at PopMatters, if anyone's interested. Peace, js
  • Why Song of the South is Offensive, or, a (Hopefully Useful) Resource for the Curious
    Let me begin by saying that, of course, Song of the South is hardly the worst movie ever made. There are even a lot of things to admire ab...
  • Blossoms & Blood review
    The first review for the PTA book ( FB page , btw) that I am aware of was posted today over at a Milwaukee-based periodical, Express Milwau...
  • Hawai'i Project
    With most of Haunted Nerves in something of a holding pattern for now (except some last minute tightening), I've moved on to my Hawai...

Categories

  • 1408
  • A Frown Upside Down
  • academia
  • affect
  • anderson (paul thomas)
  • anticipation
  • Battlestar Galactica
  • blaxploitation
  • blogathon
  • blogging
  • blossoms and blood
  • Bond
  • Bond (James)
  • Bond Blogathon
  • Bourne (Jason)
  • box office
  • Casino Royale
  • Christmas Story
  • cinephilia
  • Cinephilia and History
  • Cinephilia in the Age of Digital Reproduction
  • cinephiliac practice of everyday life
  • Coonskin
  • current projects
  • Detroit
  • Disney
  • Disney's Most Notorious Film
  • dissertation
  • exams
  • fandom
  • film review
  • ghost movies
  • Greengrass (Paul)
  • hard eight
  • Haunted Nerves
  • Hawaii
  • Hawaii Five-O
  • Hugo
  • ideology
  • Indiana University
  • James Bond
  • Keathley (Christian)
  • Las Vegas
  • Ledger (Heath)
  • Licence to Kill
  • Living Daylights
  • malls
  • Memorial Day
  • narrative
  • nostalgia
  • Oklahoma State University
  • Palahniuk
  • postmodernity
  • Princess and the Frog
  • publications
  • Punch Drunk Love
  • Quantum of Solace
  • racism
  • Reception Studies
  • repetition
  • RIP
  • ritual
  • seriality
  • song of the south
  • spoilers
  • star trek
  • star trek (2009)
  • stuff
  • television
  • The Dark Knight
  • The Descendants
  • Timothy Dalton
  • Titanic
  • tron
  • Wayne State University
  • writing

Blog Archive

  • ►  2014 (20)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2013 (5)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ▼  2012 (29)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ▼  October (4)
      • Disney's Star Wars
      • Some thoughts while waiting for the Sky(to)fall
      • A master . . . any master . . .
      • Revisiting Fedora
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (11)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (4)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2009 (4)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (18)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (3)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  July (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Gawar
View my complete profile